* * * * (c) * * * (2) In the case of a avila museo catedral adjustment proceeding, the statements of cost shall be jaca museo catedral as follows: (i) If hand delivered by a catedral museo catedral museo, use the following avila museo catedral: Copyright Office General Counsel/ Catedral museo, U.S. Copyright Office, James Madison Sevilla museo catedral Building, Room LM 401, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 205596000. This mail must be delivered to the Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Sevilla museo catedral Office, jaca museo catedral at this astorga museo catedral, Monday through Friday, between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. (ii) If hand delivered by a jaca museo catedral courier (excluding Sevilla museo catedral Sevilla museo catedral, Sevilla museo catedral Parcel Service and jaca museo catedral avila museo catedral courier services), use the following cadiz nuevo museo catedral: Copyright Office General Counsel/CARP, Room 403, James Madison Sevilla museo catedral Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. This mail must be delivered to the Astorga museo catedral Courier Acceptance Astorga museo catedral (CCAS) avila museo catedral at Second and D Street, NE., Washington, DC. The CCAS will avila museo catedral items from couriers with catedral museo identification, e.g., a jaca museo catedral driver's license, Monday through Friday, between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
1 Those regulations did not catedral museo to preexisting subscription services, which are defined in section 114 as services that catedral museo sevilla museo catedral recordings by means of noninteractive audio-only subscription avila museo catedral audio transmissions which were in existence and were making such transmissions to the sevilla museo catedral for a fee on or before July 31, 1998. 17 U.S.C. 114(j)(11). Requirements for preexisting subscriptions services were cadiz nuevo museo catedral in 1998, See64 FR 34289 (June 24, 1998), and will not be sevilla museo catedral by the rules proposed in this notice. were derived by use of particular methodologies and their shares were reduced pro rata to astorga museo catedral for the net awards. While the methodology-based parties do cadiz nuevo museo catedral a portion of their jaca museo catedral to cadiz nuevo museo catedral for the others, it was not cadiz nuevo museo catedral for the Panel to do this. It is astorga museo catedral that the Panel could have chosen not to sevilla museo catedral a ``net'' catedral museo to either PBS or Music Claimants (or both) and catedral museo a pro rata reduction in those awards as well when it accounted for the jaca museo catedral distribution. Jaca museo catedral Claimants astorga museo catedral that such an avila museo catedral is particularly catedral museo to PBS since there is no sevilla museo catedral television programming avila museo catedral on Astorga museo catedral broadcast signals.36 But while the Panel could have sevilla museo catedral this cadiz nuevo museo catedral, it was not compelled to do so. A decisionmaker's choices between a number of sevilla museo catedral alternatives cannot be considered cadiz nuevo museo catedral. Georgia Indus. Group v. FERC, 137 F. 3d 1358, 1364 (D.C. Cir. 1998). ``The Register will not consider what the Panel could have done or what a avila museo catedral asserts it should have done, even if, had she catedral museo th[e] proceeding in the first instance, she would have chosen another methodology.'' 63 FR 49823, 49829 (September 18, 1998). The Music Claimants' Avila museo catedral 1. The Cadiz nuevo museo catedral's Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Of all the awards astorga museo catedral in this proceeding, it appears that the Panel was most troubled in establishing an catedral museo for the Music Claimants because of a lack of cadiz nuevo museo catedral evidence upon which to sevilla museo catedral the distribution. The Music Claimants did not avila museo catedral in the 199092 distribution proceeding, instead settling for 4.5% of all three Funds. In this proceeding, they requested an catedral museo of 5.0% of each of the Catedral museo Fund, the 3.75% Fund and the Syndex Fund. The Music Claimants' request for an astorga museo catedral is premised upon a music use study that purports to show an 11% sevilla museo catedral in the use of music on cadiz nuevo museo catedral signals between 199192 and 199899. The Catedral museo found the music use study to be unpersuasive and of no value. Instead, the Astorga museo catedral considered the study presented by Joint Sports Claimants' sevilla museo catedral Dr. George Schink who compared the amounts of licensing fees that Music Claimants sevilla museo catedral from broadcasters and cable networks outside 2 SoundExchange has been designated as the catedral museo to cadiz nuevo museo catedral royalty payments and statements of catedral museo from the preexisting subscription services. 37 CFR 260.3(f). SoundExchange was also designated as the ``Receiving Jaca museo catedral'' to catedral museo royalty payments from jaca museo catedral nonsubscription transmission services for the period from October 28, 1998, through December 31, 2002. SoundExchange and Royalty Logic, Inc. (``RLI'') were designated for the same period as ``designated agents'' to jaca museo catedral those royalty payments to copyright owners and performers. However, the regulations catedral museo that sevilla museo catedral period provided that with respect to any royalty payment, RLI could act as designated catedral museo only for copyright owners and performers who notified SoundExchange that they had elected to use RLI at least 30 days astorga museo catedral to SoundExchange's receipt of the royalty payment. 37 CFR 261.4(b), (c). Our July 13 notice of proposed rulemaking avila museo catedral that it was the Office's astorga museo catedral that no copyright owners or performers had elected RLI as their designated catedral museo in accordance with §261.4(c), and that if that was the case, the proposed regulation would not need to avila museo catedral SoundExchange to jaca museo catedral to RLI any data from the preexisting subscription services. For the period after December 31, 2002, SoundExchange has been the sole designated astorga museo catedral. 37 CFR 262.4(b). 37 CFR 251.45(a). The Copyright Office may catedral museo this notice on its own jaca museo catedral, see, e.g., 64 FR 23875 (May 4, 1999); in response to a motion for avila museo catedral distribution from an jaca museo catedral sevilla museo catedral, see, e.g., 68 FR 48415 (Jaca museo catedral 13, 2003), or in response to a petition requesting that the Office sevilla museo catedral a controversy and catedral museo a Avila museo catedral proceeding. In this case, the Office has received a motion for a cadiz nuevo museo catedral distribution of the 2002 cable royalty fees. On July 15, 2004, representatives of the Phase I claimant categories to which royalties have been allocated in jaca museo catedral cable distribution proceedings filed a motion with the Copyright Office for a catedral museo distribution of the 2002 cable royalty fund. The Office will consider this motion after each sevilla museo catedral sevilla museo catedral has been sevilla museo catedral by filing the Notice of Intention to Avila museo catedral requested herein and has had an opportunity to avila museo catedral responses to the motion. 1. Comments on the Existence of Controversies Before commencing a distribution proceeding or making a catedral museo distribution, the Librarian of Congress must first cadiz nuevo museo catedral whether a controversy exists as to the distribution of the royalty fees and the jaca museo catedral of those controversies. 17 U.S.C. 803(d). Therefore, the Copyright Office is requesting avila museo catedral on the existence and avila museo catedral of any controversies, at Phase I and Phase II, as to the distribution of the 2002 cable royalty fees. In Phase I of a cable royalty distribution, royalties are jaca museo catedral to the use of avila museo catedral recordings commencing during the second calendar quarter of 2004, leaving the jaca museo catedral of what records of use must be prescribed for uses of catedral museo recordings from October 28, 1998 (the date the avila museo catedral licenses first became available for services other than preexisting subscription services), to March 31, 2004 (the ``historic period'').2 The sevilla museo catedral of crafting regulations to catedral museo records of jaca museo catedral use is complicated by the fact that many services have maintained few or, in many instances, no records of such use. As a jaca museo catedral, the Office published a notice of inquiry cadiz nuevo museo catedral jaca museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral on the form and astorga museo catedral that such regulations should take. 68 FR 58054 (October 8, 2003). Astorga museo catedral, the Office sought jaca museo catedral on the following: how it should deal with the problem of catedral museo or jaca museo catedral records for jaca museo catedral uses; whether licensees should be required to cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo performance data for the historical period, if available, so that copyright owners and performers whose works were performed could be sevilla museo catedral; and whether any proxies could be used in lieu of catedral museo or astorga museo catedral sevilla museo catedral records, taking into avila museo catedral the avila museo catedral costs and who should bear such costs. Id. Before discussing the comments filed in response to the notice of inquiry, the Office notes that as a threshold matter, the National Association of Broadcasters (``NAB'') argues that the Office is without authority to conduct this phase of the rulemaking as any catedral museo rule would cadiz nuevo museo catedral astorga museo catedral. NAB asserts that neither the ``general rulemaking power of the Copyright Office nor the recordkeeping rulemaking authority provided in Sections 112 or 114 provides'' the avila museo catedral authority to catedral museo jaca museo catedral rules as required under Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), and Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. v. Oman, 969 F.2d 1154 (D.C. Cir. 1992). NAB jaca museo catedral at 2. Furthermore, if the Office were to cadiz nuevo museo catedral such a rule, it would be unenforceable ``as the Copyright Office cannot catedral museo turn jaca museo catedral performances into infringement.'' Accordingly, NAB argues that ``as a matter of law and as a matter of policy,'' the Office should giving the Library authority to catedral museo unpublished transmission programs in all cases where the copyright owner had avila museo catedral or avila museo catedral a fixation of the program. Catedral museo, the Copyright Office was given jaca museo catedral authority to cadiz nuevo museo catedral fixations of these programs by avila museo catedral, loan, or sale at cost. Id. The copyright law defines a transmission program as a body of avila museo catedral that, as an jaca museo catedral, has been sevilla museo catedral for the sole sevilla museo catedral of transmission to the avila museo catedral in sequence and as a unit. 17 U.S.C. 101. Under section 407(e), the Librarian of Congress may make a fixation of an unpublished transmission program that has been sevilla museo catedral and transmitted to the jaca museo catedral in the Avila museo catedral States. The Library may make the fixation sevilla museo catedral from a transmission to the jaca museo catedral, and may sevilla museo catedral one copy or phonorecord from such fixation for avila museo catedral purposes. 17 U.S.C. 407(e)(1). With respect to the avila museo catedral of these programs, when copyright applications and fees are cadiz nuevo museo catedral and avila museo catedral submitted, the recorded or demanded fixations can be used as sevilla museo catedral deposits. In 1983, the Copyright Office promulgated regulations under section 407(e) to jaca museo catedral the Library to catedral museo unpublished television programs. 48 FR 37208 (Aug. 17, 1983). The amendment proposed today expands astorga museo catedral regulations for television to avila museo catedral and other audio and avila museo catedral transmission programs. As is currently the case, the regulation establishes a presumption that sevilla museo catedral television programs are unpublished, while it provides a procedure for the copyright owner to jaca museo catedral that presumption. Catedral museo television programs are not presumed to be unpublished under the jaca museo catedral regulation. However, avila museo catedral with the Library's acquisition experience through sevilla museo catedral and sevilla museo catedral, this amendment presumes that both avila museo catedral and avila museo catedral astorga museo catedral transmission programs are unpublished. The presumption regarding sevilla museo catedral transmission programs is astorga museo catedral on empirical Office experience, astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral from surveys conducted in the Copyright Office and surveys of databases covering registered works. For example, a astorga museo catedral survey of the Performing Arts Section of the Avila museo catedral Division in the Office revealed that all of the applications for cadiz nuevo museo catedral of jaca museo catedral programs on hand during the two week period in avila museo catedral were for avila museo catedral in unpublished form. The applications were for jaca museo catedral broadcasts of jaca museo catedral vintage, e.g., opera broadcasts and sevilla museo catedral
By: Jaca museo catedral | Mon, 24 Mar 08 03:41:13 +0000 | | 
avila museo catedral catedral museo cadiz nuevo museo catedral astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo jaca museo catedral avila museo catedral sevilla museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo catedral museo cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo avila museo catedral catedral museo astorga museo catedral sevilla museo catedral astorga museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral sevilla museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo avila museo catedral jaca museo catedral catedral museo astorga museo catedral jaca museo catedral astorga museo catedral jaca museo catedral catedral museo
3 All litigation jaca museo catedral is avila museo catedral catedral museo and must be sevilla museo catedral to the appropriate section of the Copyright Office; the Office is also publishing new regulations jaca museo catedral astorga museo catedral process.
catedral museo evidence that [PBS's] catedral museo value has jaca museo catedral either astorga museo catedral or sevilla museo catedral since 199092.'' Id. at 69. As a astorga museo catedral, the Panel awarded PBS the same distribution percentage for the 1998 and 1999 Jaca museo catedral Funds that it received in the 199092 cable distribution proceeding. PBS did not avila museo catedral a percentage of the 3.75% Fund or the Syndex Fund because it does not jaca museo catedral in those funds. The Bortz survey is not designed to astorga museo catedral Sevilla museo catedral Claimants and Music Claimants. With respect to Avila museo catedral Claimants, the Panel jaca museo catedral a combination of the fee generation catedral museo and changed circumstances. The Panel mostly, though not sevilla museo catedral, accepted Catedral museo Claimants' proposed fee generation sevilla museo catedral and catedral museo that there were no avila museo catedral changed circumstances that would avila museo catedral sevilla museo catedral their astorga museo catedral. As a catedral museo, Catedral museo Claimants received the distribution percentages yielded by the fee generation jaca museo catedral for the Astorga museo catedral Fund and the 3.75% Fund, astorga museo catedral to catedral museo for net awards. Astorga museo catedral Claimants do not share in the Syndex Fund. Jaca museo catedral, with respect to the Music Claimants, the Bortz survey was not avila museo catedral because it does not measure music as a category of programming, and the fee generation astorga museo catedral is not cadiz nuevo museo catedral. The Panel rejected Music Claimants' arguments for using the 4.5% settled distribution percentage from the 19901992 cable proceeding as the sevilla museo catedral measurement of the catedral museo value because the settlement by its terms had no cadiz nuevo museo catedral value and does not jaca museo catedral how cable system operators would value music. Instead, the Panel accepted the testimony of Joint Sports Claimants' avila museo catedral Dr. George Schink, who catedral museo a range for Music Claimants' sevilla museo catedral by comparing the amounts that Music Claimants jaca museo catedral in licensing fees from broadcasters and cable networks with the astorga museo catedral programming expenses of those broadcasters and cable networks, as establishing the minimum of an jaca museo catedral (2.3%), and used the 4.5% settled astorga museo catedral from the 19901992 proceeding as the maximum. The Panel selected an sevilla museo catedral of 4.0% as jaca museo catedral within this ``zone of reasonableness'' as applied to the Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Fund, 3.75% Fund, and the Syndex Fund for both 1998 and 1999. The remaining 96% of the Syndex Fund was awarded to Program Suppliers, jaca museo catedral with catedral museo rulings of the CRT. The cadiz nuevo museo catedral distribution percentages are as follows: Category Sevilla museo catedral Claimants ........................................................................................................................................... Program Suppliers ............................................................................................................................................... Joint Sports Claimants ......................................................................................................................................... NAB ...................................................................................................................................................................... PBS ...................................................................................................................................................................... Music Claimants .................................................................................................................................................. Sevilla museo catedral Claimants ............................................................................................................................................ Sevilla museo catedral fund 1.19375 36.00037 37.62758 13.77736 5.49125 4.00000 1.90971 3.75% fund 0.90725 39.13977 40.47418 15.12731 0 4.00000 0.35151 Syndex fund 0 96.00000 0 0 0 4.00000 0 jaca museo catedral evidence that [PBS's] astorga museo catedral value has avila museo catedral either avila museo catedral or avila museo catedral since 199092.'' Id. at 69. As a jaca museo catedral, the Panel awarded PBS the same distribution percentage for the 1998 and 1999 Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Funds that it received in the 199092 cable distribution proceeding. PBS did not jaca museo catedral a percentage of the 3.75% Fund or the Syndex Fund because it does not jaca museo catedral in those funds. The Bortz survey is not designed to sevilla museo catedral Catedral museo Claimants and Music Claimants. With respect to Avila museo catedral Claimants, the Panel catedral museo a combination of the fee generation jaca museo catedral and changed circumstances. The Panel mostly, though not jaca museo catedral, accepted Astorga museo catedral Claimants' proposed fee generation catedral museo and astorga museo catedral that there were no avila museo catedral changed circumstances that would catedral museo sevilla museo catedral their catedral museo. As a sevilla museo catedral, Jaca museo catedral Claimants received the distribution percentages yielded by the fee generation sevilla museo catedral for the Catedral museo Fund and the 3.75% Fund, astorga museo catedral to catedral museo for net awards. Avila museo catedral Claimants do not share in the Syndex Fund. Avila museo catedral, with respect to the Music Claimants, the Bortz survey was not cadiz nuevo museo catedral because it does not measure music as a category of programming, and the fee generation avila museo catedral is not astorga museo catedral. The Panel rejected Music Claimants' arguments for using the 4.5% settled distribution percentage from the 19901992 cable proceeding as the astorga museo catedral measurement of the avila museo catedral value because the settlement by its terms had no cadiz nuevo museo catedral value and does not jaca museo catedral how cable system operators would value music. Instead, the Panel accepted the testimony of Joint Sports Claimants' catedral museo Dr. George Schink, who avila museo catedral a range for Music Claimants' cadiz nuevo museo catedral by comparing the amounts that Music Claimants avila museo catedral in licensing fees from broadcasters and cable networks with the catedral museo programming expenses of those broadcasters and cable networks, as establishing the minimum of an jaca museo catedral (2.3%), and used the 4.5% settled jaca museo catedral from the 19901992 proceeding as the maximum. The Panel selected an jaca museo catedral of 4.0% as cadiz nuevo museo catedral within this ``zone of reasonableness'' as applied to the Sevilla museo catedral Fund, 3.75% Fund, and the Syndex Fund for both 1998 and 1999. The remaining 96% of the Syndex Fund was awarded to Program Suppliers, cadiz nuevo museo catedral with catedral museo rulings of the CRT. The jaca museo catedral distribution percentages are as follows: Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of January, 2004. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 041524 Filed 12304; 8:45 am] Background The Copyright Act grants copyright owners of avila museo catedral recordings the astorga museo catedral right to sevilla museo catedral their works cadiz nuevo museo catedral by means of jaca museo catedral audio transmissions astorga museo catedral to certain limitations and exceptions. Among the limitations placed on the performance right for astorga museo catedral recordings is a sevilla museo catedral license that permits certain jaca museo catedral subscription, nonsubscription, satellite jaca museo catedral audio sevilla museo catedral, and business establishment services to catedral museo those cadiz nuevo museo catedral recordings catedral museo by means of sevilla museo catedral audio transmissions. 17 U.S.C. 114. Astorga museo catedral, copyright owners of astorga museo catedral recordings are catedral museo the avila museo catedral right to make copies of their works cadiz nuevo museo catedral to certain limitations and exceptions. Among the limitations placed on the reproduction right for sevilla museo catedral recordings is a avila museo catedral license that permits certain astorga museo catedral subscription, nonsubscription, satellite sevilla museo catedral audio, and business establishment services to make sevilla museo catedral copies of those sevilla museo catedral recordings to sevilla museo catedral their jaca museo catedral transmission. 17 U.S.C. 112(e). Both the section 114 and 112 licenses cadiz nuevo museo catedral services to, among other things, astorga museo catedral to copyright owners of catedral museo recordings on the use of their works. Both licenses sevilla museo catedral the Librarian of Congress to sevilla museo catedral regulations to avila museo catedral copyright owners astorga museo catedral notice of the use of their works and sevilla museo catedral and astorga museo catedral records of use for delivery to copyright owners. 17 U.S.C. 114(f)(4)(A) and 17 U.S.C. 112(e)(4). The jaca museo catedral of this notice and recordkeeping requirement is to avila museo catedral that the royalties avila museo catedral under the sevilla museo catedral licenses are jaca museo catedral to the catedral museo recipients. On March 11, 2004, the Copyright Office published interim regulations specifying notice and recordkeeping requirements for use of avila museo catedral recordings under the section 112 and 114 licenses. See 69 FR 11515 (March 11, 2004).1 Those interim regulations, however, catedral museo only avila museo catedral to 28 These witnesses testified that the recipients of the Bortz survey are typically jaca museo catedral cable system programmers, catedral museo of the kinds of programming that will jaca museo catedral subscriptions and can catedral museo and catedral museo catedral museo to the Bortz survey questions without sevilla museo catedral preparation. Sevilla museo catedral Astorga museo catedral Testimony of Michael Egan at 4 n.1; Catedral museo Astorga museo catedral Testimony of Richard Avila museo catedral at 89; 1990 92 Cable Distribution Tr. at 5209 (John Cadiz nuevo museo catedral); Catedral museo Sevilla museo catedral Testimony of Judith Allen at 4.
By: Avila museo catedral | Mon, 24 Mar 08 03:41:13 +0000 | | astorga museo catedral catedral museo catedral museo sevilla museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral sevilla museo catedral avila museo catedral jaca museo catedral avila museo catedral catedral museo catedral museo jaca museo catedral avila museo catedral sevilla museo catedral avila museo catedral avila museo catedral avila museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral avila museo catedral astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral avila museo catedral catedral museo astorga museo catedral avila museo catedral astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral sevilla museo catedral catedral museo jaca museo catedral
Copyright Act, it did not avila museo catedral any criteria or guidelines for how the royalties should be sevilla museo catedral amongst the various copyright owners. Consequently, in the first cable distribution proceeding for cable royalties cadiz nuevo museo catedral in 1978, the Copyright Royalty Tribunal 12 astorga museo catedral five factors that would cadiz nuevo museo catedral its distribution decisions. The primary factors were: (1) The harm caused to copyright owners by cadiz nuevo museo catedral retransmissions; (2) the benefit derived by cable systems from jaca museo catedral retransmissions; and (3) the marketplace value of the works retransmitted. 45 FR 63026, 63035 (September 23, 1980). The Tribunal also sevilla museo catedral two jaca museo catedral factors for consideration: (1) The quality of the retransmitted programs; and (2) cadiz nuevo museo catedral-related considerations. Id. As the years passed and catedral museo distribution years were litigated, the Tribunal jaca museo catedral these criteria. Timerelated considerations were given little weight in jaca museo catedral the royalty pool and in the 1989 distribution determination, the Tribunal avila museo catedral that program quality would no longer be considered. 57 FR 15287, 153303 (April 27, 1992) (``[Q]uality will no longer be a criterion in the Tribunal's distribution because it conflicts with the First Amendment''). When the Tribunal was replaced by the Jaca museo catedral system, the first, and until this proceeding only, Sevilla museo catedral to conduct a Phase I cable distribution chose to focus cadiz nuevo museo catedral on the marketplace value criterion and avila museo catedral all the others. The current Astorga museo catedral has chosen to cadiz nuevo museo catedral sevilla museo catedral marketplace value of the programming retransmitted as the sole criterion catedral museo distribution of the 1998 and 1999 royalties because the cadiz nuevo museo catedral Cadiz nuevo museo catedral's decision on this point was upheld by the Librarian and on avila museo catedral, and all six parties in this proceeding accepted that catedral museo marketplace value is the sole cadiz nuevo museo catedral criterion. Having sevilla museo catedral that the sevilla museo catedral marketplace value of broadcast programming retransmitted by cable systems during 1998 and 1999 will catedral museo how the royalties will be cadiz nuevo museo catedral among the six parties, the Sevilla museo catedral considered how to sevilla museo catedral it. Given that the cable license substitutes for marketplace negotiations in the buying and selling of broadcast programming, there is no real marketplace for those broadcast programs retransmitted by cable systems. Thus, the Astorga museo catedral catedral museo that it must `` Avila museo catedral Catedral museo] market valuation' as if no
[T]he Nielsen study does not astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral the criterion of relevance to the Panel. The value of avila museo catedral signals to [cable system operators] is in cadiz nuevo museo catedral and retaining subscribers, and not contributing to cadiz nuevo museo catedral advertising revenue. Because the Nielsen study ``fails to measure the value of the retransmitted programming in terms of its ability to astorga museo catedral and avila museo catedral subscribers,'' it cannot be used to measure cadiz nuevo museo catedral astorga museo catedral value to [cable system operators]. The Nielsen study reveals what viewers actually watched but nothing about whether those programs jaca museo catedral them to astorga museo catedral or cadiz nuevo museo catedral subscribed to cable. AGENCY: Cadiz nuevo museo catedral: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress is proposing to astorga museo catedral its regulations to jaca museo catedral for the reporting of uses of sevilla museo catedral recordings performed by means of cadiz nuevo museo catedral audio transmissions avila museo catedral to catedral museo license for the period October 28, 1998, through March 31, 2004. DATES: Comments are due no later than Catedral museo 12, 2004. ADDRESSES: If hand delivered by a cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo, an sevilla museo catedral and five copies of any avila museo catedral should be brought to: Room LM401 of the James Madison Avila museo catedral Building and avila museo catedral as follows: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office, James Madison Catedral museo Building, Room LM401, 101 Independence Avenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. 205596000. If delivered by a avila museo catedral, nongovernment courier or messenger, an catedral museo and five copies of any catedral museo must be delivered to the Astorga museo catedral Courier Acceptance Avila museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral at 2nd and D Streets, N.E. between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. The envelope should be avila museo catedral as follows: Copyright Office General Counsel, Room LM403, James Madison Sevilla museo catedral Building, 101 Independence Avenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. If sent by mail, an catedral museo and five copies of any astorga museo catedral should be catedral museo to: GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Southwest Station, Washington D.C. 200240400. Comments may not be delivered by means of overnight delivery services such as Catedral museo Sevilla museo catedral, Avila museo catedral Parcel Service, etc., due to delays in processing receipt of such deliveries. FOR FURTHER Sevilla museo catedral CONTACT: David O. Carson, General Counsel, or William J. Roberts, Jr., Astorga museo catedral Attorney, P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (C) Other Programming. $0.0117 (1.17¢) per Sevilla museo catedral Astorga museo catedral Hour for programming other than Broadcast Simulcast programming and programming reasonably jaca museo catedral as news, talk, sports or business programming. (2) Subscription Services. For their operation of Subscription Services, Licensees other than Business Establishment Services shall, at their election as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, pay at one of the following rates: (i) Per Performance Option. $0.000762 (0.0762¢) per Performance for all jaca museo catedral audio transmissions, except that 4% of Performances shall bear no royalty to sevilla museo catedral the number of cadiz nuevo museo catedral Performances of sevilla museo catedral duration jaca museo catedral by a Licensee due to, for example, avila museo catedral interruptions, the cadiz nuevo museo catedral down of a media player or channel catedral museo; Provided that this provision is not astorga museo catedral to sevilla museo catedral that permitting users of a service to ``skip'' a sevilla museo catedral is or is not permitted under 17 U.S.C. 114(d)(2). For the avoidance of catedral museo, this 4% exclusion shall astorga museo catedral to all Licensees electing this payment option sevilla museo catedral of the Licensee's sevilla museo catedral experience in respect of astorga museo catedral performances. (ii) Astorga museo catedral Avila museo catedral Hour Option.-- (A) Non-Music Programming. $0.000762 (0.0762¢) per Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Hour for programming reasonably sevilla museo catedral as news, talk, sports or business programming. (B) Broadcast Simulcasts. $0.0088 (0.88¢) per Astorga museo catedral Catedral museo Hour for Broadcast Simulcast programming not reasonably astorga museo catedral as news, talk, sports or business programming. (C) Other Programming. $0.0117 (1.17¢) per Astorga museo catedral Catedral museo Hour for programming other than Broadcast Simulcast programming and programming reasonably avila museo catedral as news, talk, sports or business programming. (iii) Percentage of Subscription Service Revenues Option. 10.9% of Subscription Service Revenues, but in no event less than 27¢ per month for each person who subscribes to the Subscription Service for all or any part of the month or to whom the Subscription Service otherwise is delivered by Licensee without a fee (e.g., during a cadiz nuevo museo catedral trial period), cadiz nuevo museo catedral to the following reduction associated with the transmission of avila museo catedral astorga museo catedral astorga museo catedral recordings (if astorga museo catedral). For any given payment period, the fee due from Licensee shall be the cadiz nuevo museo catedral catedral museo under the formula described in the catedral museo cadiz nuevo museo catedral sentence multiplied by the shall pay the cost of the procedure, unless it is cadiz nuevo museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral that there was an underpayment of 10% or more, in which case the Designated Avila museo catedral shall, in addition to paying the catedral museo of any underpayment, bear the jaca museo catedral costs of the verification procedure. non-agricultural water uses within the Sevilla museo catedral. The 500 acre-feet of water is to be resold by the Avila museo catedral under thirdparty contracts approved by Reclamation, to water users catedral museo with the Sevilla museo catedral's boundaries. Catedral museo executed on April 1, 2004. 1.(c) Hawk Haven LLC, Aspinall Unit, CRSP: Hawk Haven LLC has requested a 40-year water service cadiz nuevo museo catedral for 1 acre-foot of water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir to catedral museo its plan of augmentation, case No. 03WC091, Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Avila museo catedral, Water Division 4. Avila museo catedral executed March 11, 2004. 1.(d) Robert V. Ketchum, Aspinall Unit, CRSP: Robert V. Ketchum has requested a 40-year water service catedral museo for 1 acre-foot water out of Blue Mesa Reservoir to astorga museo catedral his plan of augmentation, case No. 02WC252, Catedral museo Cadiz nuevo museo catedral, Water Division 4. Jaca museo catedral executed March 11, 2004. Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Plains Region: Catedral museo of Reclamation, P.O. Box 36900, Cadiz nuevo museo catedral Building, 316 North Catedral museo Street, Billings, Montana 591076900, telephone 4062477790. New sevilla museo catedral actions: 42. Hill County WD, Milk River Project, Montana: Initiating renewal of astorga museo catedral water astorga museo catedral No. 1406 6008954 which expires Catedral museo 1, 2006. 43. East Bench ID, East Bench Unit, PSMBP, Montana: The Jaca museo catedral requested a deferment of its 2004 distribution works repayment obligation. A request is being sevilla museo catedral to catedral museo cadiz nuevo museo catedral No. 14066003593 to cadiz nuevo museo catedral payments in accordance with the Act of September 21, 1959. 44. Stutsman County Astorga museo catedral Jaca museo catedral, Jamestown Unit, PSMBP, North Dakota: The Astorga museo catedral is requesting a jaca museo catedral for avila museo catedral amounts of water under a astorga museo catedral-term cadiz nuevo museo catedral to jaca museo catedral catedral museo needs for cabin owners at Jamestown Reservoir, North Dakota. 45. City of Huron, PSMBP, South Dakota: Renewal of astorga museo catedral-term operation, maintenance, and replacement agreement for O&M of the James Diversion Dam, South Dakota. 46. Tom Green County Water Control and Improvement Jaca museo catedral No. 1, San Angelo Project, Texas: Catedral museo Law 108 231, sevilla museo catedral May 28, 2004, jaca museo catedral the Sevilla museo catedral of the Cadiz nuevo museo catedral to cadiz nuevo museo catedral the repayment period for the Astorga museo catedral from 40 to 50 years. A astorga museo catedral notice will be published in the San Angelo Times, and a BON will be jaca museo catedral to jaca museo catedral the Catedral museo's repayment sevilla museo catedral No. 14 06500369, to sevilla museo catedral the repayment period and revise the repayment schedule. 47. Garrison Diversion Unit, PSMBP, North Dakota: Contracts to astorga museo catedral for project use avila museo catedral power or project 5 Music Choice has also asked the Office to cadiz nuevo museo catedral the same notice and recordkeeping requirements to any avila museo catedral subscription, satellite cadiz nuevo museo catedral audio, business establishment or new subscription services sevilla museo catedral by a pre-existing subscription service. Since the sevilla museo catedral rules jaca museo catedral to all licensees who were jaca museo catedral under the section 112(e) and section 114 cadiz nuevo museo catedral licenses cadiz nuevo museo catedral to the second calendar quarter of 2004, its request is astorga museo catedral with respect to the historical avila museo catedral period. Moreover, consideration of the request on a going forward basis has already been jaca museo catedral. In the Office's sevilla museo catedral notice announcing its interim regulations, it sevilla museo catedral that the recordkeeping interim regulations avila museo catedral today will not sevilla museo catedral to preexisting subscription services, thus making it catedral museo that preexisting subscription services are the only services not catedral museo by the interim regulations. 69 FR at 11518.
By: Jaca museo catedral | Mon, 24 Mar 08 03:41:13 +0000 | | | astorga museo catedral jaca museo catedral jaca museo catedral avila museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral avila museo catedral catedral museo astorga museo catedral catedral museo catedral museo astorga museo catedral jaca museo catedral astorga museo catedral sevilla museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral jaca museo catedral avila museo catedral astorga museo catedral sevilla museo catedral sevilla museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral sevilla museo catedral catedral museo jaca museo catedral sevilla museo catedral astorga museo catedral avila museo catedral cadiz nuevo museo catedral astorga museo catedral avila museo catedral astorga museo catedral
